Using Your Rules to Kill You

From Saul Alinsky's book "Rules for Radicals":

The fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity."

We face a time of hard decisions:

1.  Do we make prosperity an enemy, and define good only as what you give to those who have not earned it?
2.  Do we allow religions that are antithetical to our country's freedom of religion to grow and become a power here?
3.  Do you wish to control your life and your future, or do you want to hand over that control to someone else?

If you make being self-sufficient a crime, if you punish those who do well for themselves, than you fight the very force that drives people to succeed.  You CREATE dependent masses instead of freeing them.  You are a drug dealer, giving folks the cocaine-rush of "social justice"- which is nothing more than mob looting- and leaving them to starve as junkies until YOU decide they can have their next fix.  Problem is, you have to rob from the rich to get that fix, and when you kill the rich...the junkies will rise up and kill you.  And the sad part is, you're the junkie too.

If a religion says anyone who doesn't believe that religion must be subjugated in this world to the followers of that religion, then that religion is cancer.  It will grow on the face of a society because it appeals to the powerless who, instead of empowering themselves, seek empowerment through subjugating others.  They have already subjugated themselves to the will of their "leaders", and are ready to kill you if you do not agree with them.  They are culture killers as well as people killers.  That religion, and its followers, must be shunned, and must not be allowed to grow.  It's a hard truth.   But you MUST choose to fight them, or accept their subjugation.  That's called reality.

Socialists/Communists/Progressives talk about "the Worker."  They act as if "the Worker" is owed everything.  Strangely, they exclude higher-paid workers from their list of "Workers."   Executives are workers too.  As are engineers.  And physicists.  And CEO's, CFO's, mid-level managers, night shift managers, even company owners.   Yes, owners have to work too, and if they don't currently- they did at one time to pay for the privelidge of inheritance by the recipients of that wealth.  The companies that employ "the Worker?"  Those sources of income are the worst of the lot, according to the Socialists/Communists/Progressives.  See, the S/C/P's despise profit.  Even though profit is what pays the workers, funds the stocks, and pays the pensions.  The S/C/P gangsters hate it because the folks who run the companies, who design systems that create work for the masses, the ones who design the products workers make and the tools workers use, make more income than the Workers who fasten lug nuts onto a wheel, or put boxes on a conveyor belt.  A person who creates the avenues through which money is made is valued more in a company that tries to make a profit.  To the S/C/P gangsters , all work is equally valued, and ergo Henry Ford creating an automobile and an entire industry is of no more value than the guy who welded the radiator Henry Ford's engineer's designed.  As for that value itself, the S/C/P Priests decide what it should be, not the workers.  They, the powerful elite of the Socialist/Communist/Progressive dynasty, the "social engineers".  They live by a different rule, on an alternate reality, because, well, they CREATE the rules and the "reality."  You're just too stupid to understand it, oh mighty Worker.  So do you want control of your life and the value of the hours of your life, or do you wish to give it to the Government- a large group of people who you've most likely never met- because the Government knows what your life is worth much better than you do?   They think you're no better than the worst bum in society.  What do YOU think you're worth?

Hard decisions to be made, and they'll be judged harshly in the future no matter what you do.  So the final analysis is, do you want everyone to have a claim on your life, or do you want your life to be yours to live?  Either choice has repercussions, either choice means somebody won't get all they want.  Which choice gives the individual the best ability to achieve THEIR personal desires.  You know, "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?" 

No one guarantees your happiness.  But the Socialist/Communist/Progressive thugs will ensure that your happiness is only equal to what they decide it should be.

Make your choice.  No matter what, you'll live, or die, from the consequences.